Skip to content
← Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8

NCT03258554 · STUDY IN CONTEXT

Radiation Therapy With Durvalumab or Cetuximab in Treating Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Who Cannot Take Cisplatin

Draft scope assessment: narrower. Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded. The condition was transformed or resolved through the terminology hierarchy to reach this cancer type, so the link itself is a candidate a reviewer must confirm. Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.

Read the full study record and all posted results →

Linked outcomes

Measures are not ranked. Open each original source section for treatment groups, denominators, units and results.

primary · POSTED

DLTs were collected to verify the safety of durvalumab with RT in this population. Safety was determined if ≤ 2 of 8 participants in the cohort had any DLT, in which case the study would proceed to phase II with that dose schedule (DS). The probability for the DS to be deemed too toxic, given a true toxicity rate ≥ 45%, is at least 78%. With a true toxicity rate ≤ 20%, the probability for the DS do be deemed safe is 80%. The full DLT definition does not fit here, but includes all grade 5 AEs, grade 3 or 4 AEs definitely or probably related to durvalumab (DPRD) except for specified AEs and situations, and incomplete or \> 2-week delay completing RT due to immune toxicity DPRD. AEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0, which grade severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Two alternate DSs with a delayed 2nd dose (to reduce/avoid doses concurrent with RT) would be tried if the initial DS was too toxic.

The first eight DLT evaluable participants in a given dose schedule cohort. An evaluable participant is defined as a participant who either (1) experienced a DLT and received at least one dose of durvalumab, or (2) received at least one dose of durvalumab and one fraction of radiation therapy (RT) and completed the DLT observation period (4 weeks after RT).

→

primary · POSTED

Progression (failure) is defined as local, regional, or distant disease progression, or death from any cause. Progression was assessed by imaging, clinical assessment, or biopsy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to failure or last follow-up (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided. Analysis was planned to occur after 69 failure events had been reported.

Randomized participants

→

primary · POSTED

Overall survival (OS) time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided.

Randomized participants

→

secondary · POSTED

Locoregional progression is defined as local or regional progression or recurrence, death due to study cancer or unknown causes without documented progression. Progression was assessed by imaging, clinical assessment, or biopsy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to failure, distant metastasis (competing risk), deaths from other causes (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided.

Randomized participants

→

secondary · POSTED

Failure is defined as the occurrence of distant metastasis. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of distant metastasis, local or regional progression or recurrence (competing risk), death (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided.

Randomized participants

→

secondary · POSTED

Failure is defined as Death from second primary, protocol treatment, or "other cause". Failure time is defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of failure, death due to study cancer or unknown cause (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided.

Randomized participants

→

Reported safety

Serious events are not the same as severe events. Compare the original safety groups and their at-risk populations.

Open the study safety table →

Quality of life and patient-reported measures

EORTC QLQ · Change in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) Physical Functioning Score at One Year

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0008
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0008
source outcome index
8
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) Physical Functioning Score at One Year
measure definition
The EORTC QLQ C30 Physical Functioning score measures patient reported limitations in physical activities. Possible scores for each score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical functioning. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement for and negative values indicate.
time frame
Baseline and one year after end of radiation therapy (approximately 7 weeks)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores indicating better
population note
Randomized participants with baseline and one-year data.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Unnamed quality-of-life measure · Change in MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score at One Year

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0009
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0009
source outcome index
9
instrument
Unnamed quality-of-life measure
instrument basis
matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score at One Year
measure definition
The MDADI Composite score measures overall swallowing related quality of life derived from the emotional, functional, and physical scores, excluding the global item. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
time frame
Baseline and one year after end of radiation therapy (approximately 7 weeks)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores indicating better
population note
Randomized participants with baseline and one-year data.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Change in the EORTC QLQ C30 Global Heath Status Score at One Year

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0015
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0015
source outcome index
15
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in the EORTC QLQ C30 Global Heath Status Score at One Year
measure definition
The EORTC QLQ C30 Global Heath Status score measures overall health related quality of life. Possible scores for each scale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicate better overall quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement for and negative values indicate.
time frame
Baseline and one year
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores indicate better
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Change in the EORTC QLQ C30 Fatigue Score at One Year

Score direction: Lower is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0016
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0016
source outcome index
16
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in the EORTC QLQ C30 Fatigue Score at One Year
measure definition
The EORTC QLQ C30 fatigue score measures patient reported fatigue symptom burden. Possible scores for each score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse fatigue. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where negative values indicate improvement for and positive values indicate.
time frame
Baseline and one year
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
0
direction quote
higher scores indicating worse
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 H&N35 Swallowing Score at One Year

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0017
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0017
source outcome index
17
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 H&N35 Swallowing Score at One Year
measure definition
The EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing score measures patient-reported difficulty with swallowing various foods and liquid and ranges from 0 (no swallowing problems) to 100 (maximum swallowing difficulty). A positive change from baseline indicates worsening swallowing function.
time frame
Baseline and one year
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Unnamed quality-of-life measure · Change in MDADI Global Score at One Year

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0018
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0018
source outcome index
18
instrument
Unnamed quality-of-life measure
instrument basis
matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in MDADI Global Score at One Year
measure definition
The MDADI Global score measures patient reported overall swallowing related quality of life. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
time frame
Baseline and one year
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores indicating better
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Unnamed quality-of-life measure · Change in MDADI Emotional Score at One Year

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0019
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0019
source outcome index
19
instrument
Unnamed quality-of-life measure
instrument basis
matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in MDADI Emotional Score at One Year
measure definition
The MDADI Emotional score measures the emotional impact of swallowing difficulties on quality of life. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
time frame
Baseline and one year
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores indicating better
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Unnamed quality-of-life measure · Change in MDADI Functional Score at One Year

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0020
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0020
source outcome index
20
instrument
Unnamed quality-of-life measure
instrument basis
matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in MDADI Functional Score at One Year
measure definition
The MDADI Functional score measures the functional impact of swallowing difficulties on daily activities. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
time frame
Baseline and one year
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores indicating better
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Unnamed quality-of-life measure · Change in MDADI Physical Score at One Year

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0021
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0021
source outcome index
21
instrument
Unnamed quality-of-life measure
instrument basis
matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in MDADI Physical Score at One Year
measure definition
The MDADI Physical score measures the physical aspects of swallowing difficulties and their impact on swallowing related quality of life. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
time frame
Baseline and one year
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores indicating better
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EQ-5D · Change in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ 5D 5L) Index Score at One Year

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0022
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0022
source outcome index
22
instrument
EQ-5D
instrument basis
matched 'eq-5d' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ 5D 5L) Index Score at One Year
measure definition
The EQ-5D-5L Index score measures health related quality of life based on responses to five dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Possible scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1(best health state). Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
time frame
Baseline and 1 year
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
PRO-CTCAE · Patient Reported Outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0025
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0025
source outcome index
25
instrument
PRO-CTCAE
instrument basis
matched 'pro-ctcae' in the study's own wording
scale title
Patient Reported Outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
measure definition
PRO-CTCAE is not intended for expedited reporting, real time review or safety reporting. PRO-CTCAE data are exploratory and not currently intended for use in data safety monitoring or adverse event stopping rules.
time frame
Up to 3 years
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · QOL Endpoints Using Other Items in EORTC QLQ/HN35, EQ5D and MDADI Subscales

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
qol key
qol-0026
source section id
NCT03258554-om-0026
source outcome index
26
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
QOL Endpoints Using Other Items in EORTC QLQ/HN35, EQ5D and MDADI Subscales
measure definition
The mean change from baseline at each time point will be summarized using mean and standard deviations for each arm. Mean change from baseline will be compared between the arms using a two sample t test. If data normality assumptions are not met, the Wilcoxon rank sum test will be used to test the hypothesis. Mean change from baseline will be tested using an omnibus F test followed by individual comparisons of change scores at different time points within each treatment group. The same analysis will be conducted for between group comparisons at each time point.
time frame
Up to 12-24 months from end of RT
analysis role
exploratory
reporting status
NOT_POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Full draft applicability and source-link record
trial
release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
nct id
NCT03258554
trial label
Radiation Therapy With Durvalumab or Cetuximab in Treating Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Who Cannot Take Cisplatin
applicability
narrower
applicability note
Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded. The condition was transformed or resolved through the terminology hierarchy to reach this cancer type, so the link itself is a candidate a reviewer must confirm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
provenance class
registry-condition-search
discovery note
Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.
outcome Count
6
harms Count
3
qol Count
12
outcomes
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0000
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0000
    source outcome index
    0
    endpoint
    Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) [Lead-in Phase]
    endpoint definition
    DLTs were collected to verify the safety of durvalumab with RT in this population. Safety was determined if ≤ 2 of 8 participants in the cohort had any DLT, in which case the study would proceed to phase II with that dose schedule (DS). The probability for the DS to be deemed too toxic, given a true toxicity rate ≥ 45%, is at least 78%. With a true toxicity rate ≤ 20%, the probability for the DS do be deemed safe is 80%. The full DLT definition does not fit here, but includes all grade 5 AEs, grade 3 or 4 AEs definitely or probably related to durvalumab (DPRD) except for specified AEs and situations, and incomplete or \> 2-week delay completing RT due to immune toxicity DPRD. AEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0, which grade severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Two alternate DSs with a delayed 2nd dose (to reduce/avoid doses concurrent with RT) would be tried if the initial DS was too toxic.
    time origin
    From start of durvalumab to 4 weeks after radiation therapy, approximately 13 weeks. Weekly during RT, at RT end, prior to adjuvant durvalumab, one month after end of RT.
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    The first eight DLT evaluable participants in a given dose schedule cohort. An evaluable participant is defined as a participant who either (1) experienced a DLT and received at least one dose of durvalumab, or (2) received at least one dose of durvalumab and one fraction of radiation therapy (RT) and completed the DLT observation period (4 weeks after RT).
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0001
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0001
    source outcome index
    1
    endpoint
    Progression-free Survival (Percentage of Participants Alive Without Progression) [Phase II Primary]
    endpoint definition
    Progression (failure) is defined as local, regional, or distant disease progression, or death from any cause. Progression was assessed by imaging, clinical assessment, or biopsy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to failure or last follow-up (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided. Analysis was planned to occur after 69 failure events had been reported.
    time origin
    From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during RT, after end of RT: every 4 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, then annually. Additionally, every 4 weeks during adjuvant durvalumab. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 4.2 years.
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Randomized participants
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0002
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0002
    source outcome index
    2
    endpoint
    Overall Survival (Percentage of Participants Alive) [Originally Phase III Primary / Now Phase II Secondary]
    endpoint definition
    Overall survival (OS) time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided.
    time origin
    From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during RT, after end of RT: every 4 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, then annually. Additionally, every 4 weeks during adjuvant durvalumab. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 4.2 years.
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Randomized participants
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0003
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0003
    source outcome index
    3
    endpoint
    Locoregional Failure (Percentage of Participants With Locoregional Failure)
    endpoint definition
    Locoregional progression is defined as local or regional progression or recurrence, death due to study cancer or unknown causes without documented progression. Progression was assessed by imaging, clinical assessment, or biopsy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to failure, distant metastasis (competing risk), deaths from other causes (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided.
    time origin
    From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during RT, after end of RT: every 4 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, then annually. Additionally, every 4 weeks during adjuvant durvalumab. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 4.2 years.
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Randomized participants
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0004
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0004
    source outcome index
    4
    endpoint
    Distant Metastasis (Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis)
    endpoint definition
    Failure is defined as the occurrence of distant metastasis. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of distant metastasis, local or regional progression or recurrence (competing risk), death (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided.
    time origin
    From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during RT, after end of RT: every 4 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, then annually. Additionally, every 4 weeks during adjuvant durvalumab. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 4.2 years.
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Randomized participants
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0005
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0005
    source outcome index
    5
    endpoint
    Competing Mortality (Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Causes Other Than Study Cancer)
    endpoint definition
    Failure is defined as Death from second primary, protocol treatment, or "other cause". Failure time is defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of failure, death due to study cancer or unknown cause (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Two-year estimates are provided.
    time origin
    From randomization to last follow-up: weekly during RT, after end of RT: every 4 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, then annually. Additionally, every 4 weeks during adjuvant durvalumab. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 4.2 years.
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Randomized participants
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
arms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0000
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    (Lead-in) RT + Durvalumab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Durvalumab 1500 mg IV starts two weeks prior to RT and continues every 4 weeks for a total of seven cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    8
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0000#groups/OG000
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    RT + Cetuximab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Cetuximab 400 mg/m\^2 IV starts one week prior to RT, then 250 mg/m\^2 weekly for seven additional cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    63
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0001#groups/OG000
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    RT + Durvalumab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Durvalumab 1500 mg IV starts two weeks prior to RT and continues every 4 weeks for a total of seven cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    123
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0001#groups/OG001
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    RT+ Cetuximab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Cetuximab 400 mg/m\^2 IV starts one week prior to RT, then 250 mg/m\^2 weekly for seven additional cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    63
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0002#groups/OG000
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    RT + Durvalumab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Durvalumab 1500 mg IV starts two weeks prior to RT and continues every 4 weeks for a total of seven cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    123
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0002#groups/OG001
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    RT+ Cetuximab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Cetuximab 400 mg/m\^2 IV starts one week prior to RT, then 250 mg/m\^2 weekly for seven additional cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    63
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0003#groups/OG000
  7. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    RT + Durvalumab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Durvalumab 1500 mg IV starts two weeks prior to RT and continues every 4 weeks for a total of seven cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    123
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0003#groups/OG001
  8. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    RT+ Cetuximab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Cetuximab 400 mg/m\^2 IV starts one week prior to RT, then 250 mg/m\^2 weekly for seven additional cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    63
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0004#groups/OG000
  9. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    RT + Durvalumab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Durvalumab 1500 mg IV starts two weeks prior to RT and continues every 4 weeks for a total of seven cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    123
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0004#groups/OG001
  10. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0005
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    RT+ Cetuximab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Cetuximab 400 mg/m\^2 IV starts one week prior to RT, then 250 mg/m\^2 weekly for seven additional cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    63
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0005#groups/OG000
  11. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    outcome key
    om-0005
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    RT + Durvalumab
    regimen
    IMRT for seven weeks, 5 fractions/week. Durvalumab 1500 mg IV starts two weeks prior to RT and continues every 4 weeks for a total of seven cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    123
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03258554-om-0005#groups/OG001
harms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    harm key
    EG000
    source section id
    NCT03258554-ae
    event group key
    EG000
    event group label
    (Lead-in) RT + Durvalumab
    serious affected
    4
    serious at risk
    10
    other affected
    10
    other at risk
    10
    frequency threshold
    0
    collection period
    Weekly during RT, RT end, from end of RT: months 1, (Cetuximab: 2, 3,) 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, then annually. Additionally, prior to each adjuvant durvalumab cycle. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis= 4.2 yr.
    event definition
    All-cause mortality was assessed in all enrolled participants. Adverse events were assessed in enrolled participants who started study treatment. CTCAE 4.0 was used in the lead-in component and CTCAE 5.0 was used in the phase II component.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    harm key
    EG001
    source section id
    NCT03258554-ae
    event group key
    EG001
    event group label
    RT + Cetuximab
    serious affected
    51
    serious at risk
    61
    other affected
    61
    other at risk
    61
    frequency threshold
    0
    collection period
    Weekly during RT, RT end, from end of RT: months 1, (Cetuximab: 2, 3,) 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, then annually. Additionally, prior to each adjuvant durvalumab cycle. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis= 4.2 yr.
    event definition
    All-cause mortality was assessed in all enrolled participants. Adverse events were assessed in enrolled participants who started study treatment. CTCAE 4.0 was used in the lead-in component and CTCAE 5.0 was used in the phase II component.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    harm key
    EG002
    source section id
    NCT03258554-ae
    event group key
    EG002
    event group label
    RT + Durvalumab
    serious affected
    84
    serious at risk
    119
    other affected
    118
    other at risk
    119
    frequency threshold
    0
    collection period
    Weekly during RT, RT end, from end of RT: months 1, (Cetuximab: 2, 3,) 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, then annually. Additionally, prior to each adjuvant durvalumab cycle. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis= 4.2 yr.
    event definition
    All-cause mortality was assessed in all enrolled participants. Adverse events were assessed in enrolled participants who started study treatment. CTCAE 4.0 was used in the lead-in component and CTCAE 5.0 was used in the phase II component.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
quality of life
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0008
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0008
    source outcome index
    8
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) Physical Functioning Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The EORTC QLQ C30 Physical Functioning score measures patient reported limitations in physical activities. Possible scores for each score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical functioning. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement for and negative values indicate.
    time frame
    Baseline and one year after end of radiation therapy (approximately 7 weeks)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores indicating better
    population note
    Randomized participants with baseline and one-year data.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0009
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0009
    source outcome index
    9
    instrument
    Unnamed quality-of-life measure
    instrument basis
    matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The MDADI Composite score measures overall swallowing related quality of life derived from the emotional, functional, and physical scores, excluding the global item. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
    time frame
    Baseline and one year after end of radiation therapy (approximately 7 weeks)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores indicating better
    population note
    Randomized participants with baseline and one-year data.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0015
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0015
    source outcome index
    15
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in the EORTC QLQ C30 Global Heath Status Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The EORTC QLQ C30 Global Heath Status score measures overall health related quality of life. Possible scores for each scale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicate better overall quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement for and negative values indicate.
    time frame
    Baseline and one year
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores indicate better
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0016
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0016
    source outcome index
    16
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in the EORTC QLQ C30 Fatigue Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The EORTC QLQ C30 fatigue score measures patient reported fatigue symptom burden. Possible scores for each score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse fatigue. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where negative values indicate improvement for and positive values indicate.
    time frame
    Baseline and one year
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    0
    direction quote
    higher scores indicating worse
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0017
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0017
    source outcome index
    17
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 H&N35 Swallowing Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing score measures patient-reported difficulty with swallowing various foods and liquid and ranges from 0 (no swallowing problems) to 100 (maximum swallowing difficulty). A positive change from baseline indicates worsening swallowing function.
    time frame
    Baseline and one year
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0018
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0018
    source outcome index
    18
    instrument
    Unnamed quality-of-life measure
    instrument basis
    matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in MDADI Global Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The MDADI Global score measures patient reported overall swallowing related quality of life. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
    time frame
    Baseline and one year
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores indicating better
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  7. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0019
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0019
    source outcome index
    19
    instrument
    Unnamed quality-of-life measure
    instrument basis
    matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in MDADI Emotional Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The MDADI Emotional score measures the emotional impact of swallowing difficulties on quality of life. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
    time frame
    Baseline and one year
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores indicating better
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  8. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0020
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0020
    source outcome index
    20
    instrument
    Unnamed quality-of-life measure
    instrument basis
    matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in MDADI Functional Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The MDADI Functional score measures the functional impact of swallowing difficulties on daily activities. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
    time frame
    Baseline and one year
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores indicating better
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  9. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0021
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0021
    source outcome index
    21
    instrument
    Unnamed quality-of-life measure
    instrument basis
    matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in MDADI Physical Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The MDADI Physical score measures the physical aspects of swallowing difficulties and their impact on swallowing related quality of life. Possible scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing related quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
    time frame
    Baseline and one year
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores indicating better
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  10. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0022
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0022
    source outcome index
    22
    instrument
    EQ-5D
    instrument basis
    matched 'eq-5d' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ 5D 5L) Index Score at One Year
    measure definition
    The EQ-5D-5L Index score measures health related quality of life based on responses to five dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Possible scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1(best health state). Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
    time frame
    Baseline and 1 year
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  11. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0025
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0025
    source outcome index
    25
    instrument
    PRO-CTCAE
    instrument basis
    matched 'pro-ctcae' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Patient Reported Outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
    measure definition
    PRO-CTCAE is not intended for expedited reporting, real time review or safety reporting. PRO-CTCAE data are exploratory and not currently intended for use in data safety monitoring or adverse event stopping rules.
    time frame
    Up to 3 years
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  12. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-clinical-stage-iii-hpv-mediated-p16-positive-oropharyngeal-carcinoma-ajc
    nct id
    NCT03258554
    qol key
    qol-0026
    source section id
    NCT03258554-om-0026
    source outcome index
    26
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    QOL Endpoints Using Other Items in EORTC QLQ/HN35, EQ5D and MDADI Subscales
    measure definition
    The mean change from baseline at each time point will be summarized using mean and standard deviations for each arm. Mean change from baseline will be compared between the arms using a two sample t test. If data normality assumptions are not met, the Wilcoxon rank sum test will be used to test the hypothesis. Mean change from baseline will be tested using an omnibus F test followed by individual comparisons of change scores at different time points within each treatment group. The same analysis will be conducted for between group comparisons at each time point.
    time frame
    Up to 12-24 months from end of RT
    analysis role
    exploratory
    reporting status
    NOT_POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
setting source links

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice