NCT02122172 · STUDY IN CONTEXT
Afatinib in Advanced Refractory Urothelial Cancer
Draft scope assessment: unclear. Attached because the study's own record describes recurrent disease. The study was not selected for this indication by its sponsor, and its eligibility has not been reconciled against this page in full. Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.
Read the full study record and all posted results →
Linked outcomes
Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. Estimated at 3 months using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Includes both complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR). Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions: Complete Response (CR) is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm); Partial Response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
These analyses were conducted using available archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from surgical specimens. Each sample was tested to determine whether there was EGFR amplification.
These analyses were conducted using available archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from surgical specimens. Each sample was tested to determine whether there was HER2 amplification.
Reported safety
Quality of life and patient-reported measures
No linked quality-of-life measure is recorded for this setting and study.
Full draft applicability and source-link record
- trial
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- trial label
- Afatinib in Advanced Refractory Urothelial Cancer
- applicability
- unclear
- applicability note
- Attached because the study's own record describes recurrent disease. The study was not selected for this indication by its sponsor, and its eligibility has not been reconciled against this page in full.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- provenance class
- registry-condition-search
- discovery note
- Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.
- outcome Count
- 6
- harms Count
- 2
- qol Count
- 0
- outcomes
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0000
- source section id
- NCT02122172-om-0000
- source outcome index
- 0
- endpoint
- Progression-free Survival (PFS)
- endpoint definition
- Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. Estimated at 3 months using the Kaplan-Meier method.
- time origin
- 3 months
- analysis role
- primary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- Analysis population included those in the main Phase II study
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0001
- source section id
- NCT02122172-om-0001
- source outcome index
- 1
- endpoint
- Overall Response Rate
- endpoint definition
- Includes both complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR). Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions: Complete Response (CR) is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm); Partial Response (PR) is defined as \>=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
- time origin
- Up to 3 years
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- Analysis population includes those patients in the main Phase II study
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0002
- source section id
- NCT02122172-om-0002
- source outcome index
- 2
- endpoint
- Median Progression-free Survival (PFS ) Time
- endpoint definition
- Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
- time origin
- Up to 3 years
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- Analysis population includes patients from the main Phase II study
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0003
- source section id
- NCT02122172-om-0003
- source outcome index
- 3
- endpoint
- Median Overall Survival (OS) Time
- endpoint definition
- Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
- time origin
- Up to 3 years
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- Analysis population includes those in the main Phase II study
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0004
- source section id
- NCT02122172-om-0004
- source outcome index
- 4
- endpoint
- EGFR Expression Status
- endpoint definition
- These analyses were conducted using available archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from surgical specimens. Each sample was tested to determine whether there was EGFR amplification.
- time origin
- Baseline
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- The analysis sample included those in the main Phase II study. Two patients did not have a sample to analyze.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0005
- source section id
- NCT02122172-om-0005
- source outcome index
- 5
- endpoint
- HER2 Expression Status
- endpoint definition
- These analyses were conducted using available archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from surgical specimens. Each sample was tested to determine whether there was HER2 amplification.
- time origin
- Baseline
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- Analysis population included those in the main Phase II study. Two patients did not have a sample to analyze
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- arms
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0000
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Treatment (Afatinib)
- regimen
- Patients receive afatinib dimaleate PO QD on days 1-42. Courses repeat every 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. afatinib dimaleate: Given PO laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies
- analyzed count
- 23
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT02122172-om-0000#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0001
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Treatment (Afatinib)
- regimen
- Patients receive afatinib dimaleate PO QD on days 1-42. Courses repeat every 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. afatinib dimaleate: Given PO laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies
- analyzed count
- 23
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT02122172-om-0001#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0002
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Treatment (Afatinib)
- regimen
- Patients receive afatinib dimaleate PO QD on days 1-42. Courses repeat every 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. afatinib dimaleate: Given PO laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies
- analyzed count
- 23
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT02122172-om-0002#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0003
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Treatment (Afatinib)
- regimen
- Patients receive afatinib dimaleate PO QD on days 1-42. Courses repeat every 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. afatinib dimaleate: Given PO laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies
- analyzed count
- 23
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT02122172-om-0003#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0004
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Treatment (Afatinib)
- regimen
- Patients receive afatinib dimaleate PO QD on days 1-42. Courses repeat every 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. afatinib dimaleate: Given PO laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies
- analyzed count
- 21
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT02122172-om-0004#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- outcome key
- om-0005
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Treatment (Afatinib)
- regimen
- Patients receive afatinib dimaleate PO QD on days 1-42. Courses repeat every 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. afatinib dimaleate: Given PO laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies
- analyzed count
- 21
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT02122172-om-0005#groups/OG000
- harms
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- harm key
- EG000
- source section id
- NCT02122172-ae
- event group key
- EG000
- event group label
- Treatment (Afatinib) - Phase II Study
- serious affected
- 11
- serious at risk
- 23
- other affected
- 23
- other at risk
- 23
- frequency threshold
- 5
- collection period
- From the initiation of treatment to 28 days after the last administration of trial drugs, up to 1 year
- event definition
- For the Other Adverse Events, the number of participants reported for each adverse event is an upper bound estimate.
- undenominated note
- Source null
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-bladder-cancer-recurrent-a15d6191
- nct id
- NCT02122172
- harm key
- EG001
- source section id
- NCT02122172-ae
- event group key
- EG001
- event group label
- Treatment (Afatinib) - Molecularly Selected Cohort
- serious affected
- 3
- serious at risk
- 9
- other affected
- 9
- other at risk
- 9
- frequency threshold
- 5
- collection period
- From the initiation of treatment to 28 days after the last administration of trial drugs, up to 1 year
- event definition
- For the Other Adverse Events, the number of participants reported for each adverse event is an upper bound estimate.
- undenominated note
- Source null
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- quality of life
- setting source links
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle