Skip to content
← AL Amyloidosis

NCT04512235 · STUDY IN CONTEXT

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CAEL-101 in Patients With Mayo Stage IIIa AL Amyloidosis (CARES)

Draft scope assessment: narrower. Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded. Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.

Read the full study record and all posted results →

Linked outcomes

Measures are not ranked. Open each original source section for treatment groups, denominators, units and results.

primary · POSTED

Time to all-cause mortality was defined as the number of weeks from the date of randomization to the date of death if it is on or before the end of PETP. Participants alive at the end of PETP (LPI+18 months) were censored at their last known alive date recorded within the PETP. CVHs were events adjudicated and confirmed as such by the Clinical Event Adjudication Committee (CEAC). Hypothesis testing with the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and treatment effect estimation with the win-ratio method based on pairwise comparisons of participant outcomes with comparisons performed in a hierarchical manner. To calculate win ratio, participant outcomes based on time to all-cause mortality were first compared and if there was no 'winner' due to censoring then a comparison based on frequency of cardiovascular hospitalization was made. A win ratio \>1 represents a more favorable outcome for CAEL-101 over placebo.

Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'. For the win-ratio analysis, comparisons were made between participants in the 'CAEL-101 + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment' arm and the 'Placebo + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment' arm of each reporting group.

→

primary · POSTED

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, at any dose, that was not necessarily related to the treatment. A TEAE was an AE with an occurrence defined as follows: last study intervention day-first study intervention day + 140 days. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.

Safety Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study intervention. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Safety Set Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'.

→

secondary · POSTED

The KCCQ-OS is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge and quality of life. It uses an ordinal, adjectival (Likert) scale. Participants provide their level of agreement or disagreement with an agree-disagree scale for a series of statements. The questionnaire captures how the participants feel physically. The overall score was calculated as the sum from all 23 items and ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflected better health status (fewer symptoms, fewer social or physical limitations, and better quality of life).

Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

→

secondary · POSTED

The 6MWT measures the distance a participant can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes. It evaluates the global and integrated response of all the systems involved during exercise. This is a self-paced test; participants choose their own intensity of exercise and are allowed to stop and rest during the test.

Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

→

secondary · POSTED

All-cause mortality was defined as death on or before the end of the PETP. Otherwise, participants who were alive at the end of the PETP (last participant randomized plus 18 months) were censored at their last known alive date recorded within the PETP. All deaths, regardless of causality or whether they were reported as a reason for study discontinuation, are reported in the All-Cause Mortality section.

Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'.

→

secondary · POSTED

CVHs were those events that were adjudicated and confirmed as such by the CEAC. Frequency of CVH was calculated using negative binomial regression analysis with study intervention, study, geographic region, daratumumab usage at Baseline, and offset term equal to log of each participant's follow-up time for cardiovascular hospitalization included in the model.

Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'.

→

Reported safety

Serious events are not the same as severe events. Compare the original safety groups and their at-risk populations.

Open the study safety table →

Quality of life and patient-reported measures

Unnamed quality-of-life measure · Change From Baseline in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Score (KCCQ-OS)

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-al-amyloidosis
nct id
NCT04512235
qol key
qol-0002
source section id
NCT04512235-om-0002
source outcome index
2
instrument
Unnamed quality-of-life measure
instrument basis
matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change From Baseline in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Score (KCCQ-OS)
measure definition
The KCCQ-OS is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge and quality of life. It uses an ordinal, adjectival (Likert) scale. Participants provide their level of agreement or disagreement with an agree-disagree scale for a series of statements. The questionnaire captures how the participants feel physically. The overall score was calculated as the sum from all 23 items and ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflected better health status (fewer symptoms, fewer social or physical limitations, and better quality of life).
time frame
Baseline, Week 50
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores reflected better
population note
Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
SF-36 / SF-12 · Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Version 2 (v2) Physical Component Score (PCS)

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-al-amyloidosis
nct id
NCT04512235
qol key
qol-0007
source section id
NCT04512235-om-0007
source outcome index
7
instrument
SF-36 / SF-12
instrument basis
matched 'sf-36' in the study's own wording
scale title
Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Version 2 (v2) Physical Component Score (PCS)
measure definition
The SF-36v2 is a self-administered questionnaire containing 36 items that measure health on functional status, well-being, and overall evaluation of health in 8 domains, including vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health, using scaled, ordinal responses (for example, All of the time, Most of the time, A good bit of the time). The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating an increased quality of life. The 8 multi-item scales are aggregated and summed to give the final PCS. The final score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating an increased quality of life.
time frame
Baseline, Week 50
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported for Intent-to-Treat Set. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Full draft applicability and source-link record
trial
release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-al-amyloidosis
nct id
NCT04512235
trial label
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CAEL-101 in Patients With Mayo Stage IIIa AL Amyloidosis (CARES)
applicability
narrower
applicability note
Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
provenance class
registry-condition-search
discovery note
Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.
outcome Count
6
harms Count
2
qol Count
2
outcomes
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0000
    source section id
    NCT04512235-om-0000
    source outcome index
    0
    endpoint
    A Hierarchical Combination of Time to All-cause Mortality and Frequency of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations (CVHs) Analyzed by Win Ratio
    endpoint definition
    Time to all-cause mortality was defined as the number of weeks from the date of randomization to the date of death if it is on or before the end of PETP. Participants alive at the end of PETP (LPI+18 months) were censored at their last known alive date recorded within the PETP. CVHs were events adjudicated and confirmed as such by the Clinical Event Adjudication Committee (CEAC). Hypothesis testing with the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and treatment effect estimation with the win-ratio method based on pairwise comparisons of participant outcomes with comparisons performed in a hierarchical manner. To calculate win ratio, participant outcomes based on time to all-cause mortality were first compared and if there was no 'winner' due to censoring then a comparison based on frequency of cardiovascular hospitalization was made. A win ratio \>1 represents a more favorable outcome for CAEL-101 over placebo.
    time origin
    Day 1 through end of the participant's PETP (Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis. Therefore, the primary analysis for the study was conducted 18-49 months after the study randomization.)
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'. For the win-ratio analysis, comparisons were made between participants in the 'CAEL-101 + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment' arm and the 'Placebo + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment' arm of each reporting group.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0001
    source section id
    NCT04512235-om-0001
    source outcome index
    1
    endpoint
    Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
    endpoint definition
    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, at any dose, that was not necessarily related to the treatment. A TEAE was an AE with an occurrence defined as follows: last study intervention day-first study intervention day + 140 days. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.
    time origin
    Day 1 through end of the participant's PETP (Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis. Therefore, the primary analysis for the study was conducted 18-49 months after the study randomization.)
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Safety Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study intervention. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Safety Set Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0002
    source section id
    NCT04512235-om-0002
    source outcome index
    2
    endpoint
    Change From Baseline in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Score (KCCQ-OS)
    endpoint definition
    The KCCQ-OS is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge and quality of life. It uses an ordinal, adjectival (Likert) scale. Participants provide their level of agreement or disagreement with an agree-disagree scale for a series of statements. The questionnaire captures how the participants feel physically. The overall score was calculated as the sum from all 23 items and ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflected better health status (fewer symptoms, fewer social or physical limitations, and better quality of life).
    time origin
    Baseline, Week 50
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0003
    source section id
    NCT04512235-om-0003
    source outcome index
    3
    endpoint
    Change From Baseline in Distance Walked During a Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT)
    endpoint definition
    The 6MWT measures the distance a participant can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes. It evaluates the global and integrated response of all the systems involved during exercise. This is a self-paced test; participants choose their own intensity of exercise and are allowed to stop and rest during the test.
    time origin
    Baseline, Week 50
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0004
    source section id
    NCT04512235-om-0004
    source outcome index
    4
    endpoint
    All-cause Mortality
    endpoint definition
    All-cause mortality was defined as death on or before the end of the PETP. Otherwise, participants who were alive at the end of the PETP (last participant randomized plus 18 months) were censored at their last known alive date recorded within the PETP. All deaths, regardless of causality or whether they were reported as a reason for study discontinuation, are reported in the All-Cause Mortality section.
    time origin
    Day 1 through end of the participant's PETP (Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis. Therefore, analysis for the study was conducted 18-49 months after the study randomization.)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0005
    source section id
    NCT04512235-om-0005
    source outcome index
    5
    endpoint
    Frequency of CVHs
    endpoint definition
    CVHs were those events that were adjudicated and confirmed as such by the CEAC. Frequency of CVH was calculated using negative binomial regression analysis with study intervention, study, geographic region, daratumumab usage at Baseline, and offset term equal to log of each participant's follow-up time for cardiovascular hospitalization included in the model.
    time origin
    Day 1 through end of the participant's PETP (Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis. Therefore, analysis for the study was conducted 18-49 months after the study randomization.)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
arms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0000
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Combined CAEL-101 + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment and Placebo + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    In addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment, participants were administered either CAEL-101 or placebo as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours until LPI+18 months.
    analyzed count
    281
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0000#groups/OG000
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    CAEL-101 + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered CAEL-101 as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    187
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0001#groups/OG000
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Placebo + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered placebo as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    94
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0001#groups/OG001
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    CAEL-101 + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered CAEL-101 as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    120
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0002#groups/OG000
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Placebo + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered placebo as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    58
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0002#groups/OG001
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    CAEL-101 + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered CAEL-101 as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    123
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0003#groups/OG000
  7. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Placebo + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered placebo as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    56
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0003#groups/OG001
  8. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    CAEL-101 + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered CAEL-101 as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    187
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0004#groups/OG000
  9. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Placebo + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered placebo as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    94
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0004#groups/OG001
  10. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0005
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    CAEL-101 + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered CAEL-101 as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    187
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0005#groups/OG000
  11. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    outcome key
    om-0005
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Placebo + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    regimen
    During the PETP, participants were administered placebo as an IV infusion over approximately 2 hours, in addition to SoC plasma cell dyscrasia treatment. All participants continued their double-blind treatment until LPI+18 months. All participants had the option to enter into the OLEP, where they continued to receive CAEL-101 in addition to any SoC prescribed by a physician.
    analyzed count
    94
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT04512235-om-0005#groups/OG001
harms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    harm key
    EG000
    source section id
    NCT04512235-ae
    event group key
    EG000
    event group label
    CAEL-101 + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    serious affected
    132
    serious at risk
    187
    other affected
    179
    other at risk
    187
    frequency threshold
    5
    collection period
    Day 1 through end of the participant's PETP (Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis. Therefore, safety analysis for the study was conducted 18-49 months after the study randomization.)
    event definition
    Serious and non-serious adverse events based upon the Safety Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. All-cause mortality based upon the Intent-to-treat Set: all participants who were randomized. All deaths, regardless of causality or whether they were reported as a reason for study discontinuation, are reported in the All-Cause Mortality section. Only deaths indicated as leading to study discontinuation are reported in the Participant Flow section.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    harm key
    EG001
    source section id
    NCT04512235-ae
    event group key
    EG001
    event group label
    Placebo + Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment
    serious affected
    68
    serious at risk
    94
    other affected
    91
    other at risk
    94
    frequency threshold
    5
    collection period
    Day 1 through end of the participant's PETP (Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis. Therefore, safety analysis for the study was conducted 18-49 months after the study randomization.)
    event definition
    Serious and non-serious adverse events based upon the Safety Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. All-cause mortality based upon the Intent-to-treat Set: all participants who were randomized. All deaths, regardless of causality or whether they were reported as a reason for study discontinuation, are reported in the All-Cause Mortality section. Only deaths indicated as leading to study discontinuation are reported in the Participant Flow section.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
quality of life
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    qol key
    qol-0002
    source section id
    NCT04512235-om-0002
    source outcome index
    2
    instrument
    Unnamed quality-of-life measure
    instrument basis
    matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change From Baseline in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Score (KCCQ-OS)
    measure definition
    The KCCQ-OS is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge and quality of life. It uses an ordinal, adjectival (Likert) scale. Participants provide their level of agreement or disagreement with an agree-disagree scale for a series of statements. The questionnaire captures how the participants feel physically. The overall score was calculated as the sum from all 23 items and ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflected better health status (fewer symptoms, fewer social or physical limitations, and better quality of life).
    time frame
    Baseline, Week 50
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores reflected better
    population note
    Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported as 'Overall (All Randomized Participants)' and per subgroups 'Kappa FLC Subtype' and 'Lambda FLC Subtype'. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-al-amyloidosis
    nct id
    NCT04512235
    qol key
    qol-0007
    source section id
    NCT04512235-om-0007
    source outcome index
    7
    instrument
    SF-36 / SF-12
    instrument basis
    matched 'sf-36' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Version 2 (v2) Physical Component Score (PCS)
    measure definition
    The SF-36v2 is a self-administered questionnaire containing 36 items that measure health on functional status, well-being, and overall evaluation of health in 8 domains, including vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health, using scaled, ordinal responses (for example, All of the time, Most of the time, A good bit of the time). The SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating an increased quality of life. The 8 multi-item scales are aggregated and summed to give the final PCS. The final score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating an increased quality of life.
    time frame
    Baseline, Week 50
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Intent-to-Treat Set: all participants who were randomized. As prespecified, data collected and reported for Intent-to-Treat Set. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
setting source links

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice