{"analyses":[{"ciLowerLimit":"0.92","ciNumSides":"TWO_SIDED","ciPctValue":"97.5","ciUpperLimit":"1.15","groupDescription":"Equivalence of treatment arm A ('XELOX') to treatment arm B ('FOLFOX-4') was tested via the following hypotheses - H0: HRA/B \\>/= 1.23 versus H1: HRA/B \\< 1.23. HRA/B denotes the hazard of disease progression or death under treatment A ('XELOX') divided by the hazard of disease progression or death under treatment B ('FOLFOX-4').","groupIds":["OG000","OG001"],"nonInferiorityComment":"Non-inferiority was demonstrated if the upper limit of the 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the hazard ratio (HR) was less than the predefined limit of 1.23 (the non-inferiority margin). A stratified Cox model was used. In order to retain an experiment-wise two-sided type I error of 5%, the non-inferiority analysis for PFS used a two-sided significance level of 2.5%.","nonInferiorityType":"NON_INFERIORITY_OR_EQUIVALENCE","paramType":"Hazard Ratio (HR)","paramValue":"1.03","testedNonInferiority":true}],"classes":[{"categories":[{"measurements":[{"groupId":"OG000","lowerLimit":"247","upperLimit":"270","value":"260.0"},{"groupId":"OG001","lowerLimit":"230","upperLimit":"255","value":"244.0"}]}]}],"denoms":[{"counts":[{"groupId":"OG000","value":"937"},{"groupId":"OG001","value":"967"}],"units":"Participants"}],"description":"PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who underwent curative surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of their tumor were not censored at the date of surgery, but any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or death was considered as an event. Non-inferiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.","dispersionType":"95% Confidence Interval","groups":[{"description":"Participants from the initial 2-arm part and the 2x2 factorial part of the study including the following groups -\n\n1. Folfox-4: Participants who received 2-week cycles of infused leucovorin, bolus injection fluorouracil and continuous infusion fluorouracil (given on days 1 and 2), combined with intravenous oxaliplatin (given on day 1).\n2. Folfox-4+P: Participants who received 2-week cycles of infused leucovorin, bolus injection fluorouracil and continuous infusion fluorouracil (given on days 1 and 2), combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and placebo control for bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 2 weeks).\n3. Folfox-4+BV: Participants who received 2-week cycles of infused leucovorin, bolus injection fluorouracil and continuous infusion fluorouracil (given on days 1 and 2), combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and intravenous bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 2 weeks).","id":"OG000","title":"FOLFOX-4/FOLFOX-4+P/FOLFOX-4+BV"},{"description":"Participants from the initial 2-arm part and the 2x2 factorial part of the study including the following groups -\n\n1. Xelox: Capecitabine was administered as an oral twice-daily outpatient intermittent treatment (3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment) combined with intravenous oxaliplatin (given on day 1).\n2. Xelox+P: Capecitabine was administered as an oral twice-daily outpatient intermittent treatment (3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment) combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and placebo (P) control for bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 3 weeks).\n3. Xelox+BV: Capecitabine was administered as an oral twice-daily outpatient intermittent treatment (3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment) combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and intravenous bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 3 weeks).","id":"OG001","title":"XELOX/XELOX+P/XELOX+BV"}],"paramType":"MEDIAN","populationDescription":"EPP excluded participants from the ITT who had violated major protocol inclusion or exclusion criteria or participants who were randomized and did not receive at least one dose of capecitabine, 5-FU, oxaliplatin, or bevacizumab/placebo.","reportingStatus":"POSTED","timeFrame":"Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months","title":"PFS by General Approach, Participants With Curative Surgery Not Censored: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4","type":"SECONDARY","unitOfMeasure":"days"}